1
0 Comments

My Copywriting-GPT-3-App vs. the big boys

Hey folks! :)

I'm working on a GPT-3-based copywriting-companion. I'd be very interested what you think of the idea! In its essence, the companion should assist copywriters during brainstorming and provide feedback on the created content.

When working with it, the workflow would look something like this:

  1. Type in basic information about a product/topic
  2. GPT-3 generates copies
  3. Generate again or pick out the copy you liked most
  4. Let GPT-3 take the position of a potential customer that asks (critical) questions
  5. In case GPT-3 touches on some important topics that you can make use of for a better copy: Improve copy
  6. Let GPT-3 ask again and improve until no relevant pain points etc. are left unaddressed

Here's a 2 min demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-T3sdsuBHs

Copywriting is a very popular use case for GPT-3-Apps and it seems like two companies (copy.ai and copysmith.ai) are getting ever-more dominant in this niche. However, I hope that the feedback-loop-feature is somewhat gamifying the experience and making it more fun to use than the competition's "generate-only" implementations. Comparing the idea & demo with copy.ai and copysmith.ai, do you think my app stands a chance? And if not, where do I have to improve most?

on May 7, 2021
Trending on Indie Hackers
I launched on Product Hunt today with 0 followers, 0 network, and 0 users. Here's what I learned in 12 hours. User Avatar 79 comments My users are making my product better without knowing it. Here's how I designed that. User Avatar 66 comments A simple LinkedIn prospecting trick that improved our lead quality User Avatar 60 comments I changed AIagent2 from dashboard-first to chat-first. Does this feel clearer? User Avatar 39 comments I gave 7 AI agents $100 each to build a startup. Here's what happened on Day 1. User Avatar 31 comments The most underrated distribution channel in SaaS is hiding in your browser toolbar User Avatar 29 comments