1
0 Comments

My Copywriting-GPT-3-App vs. the big boys

Hey folks! :)

I'm working on a GPT-3-based copywriting-companion. I'd be very interested what you think of the idea! In its essence, the companion should assist copywriters during brainstorming and provide feedback on the created content.

When working with it, the workflow would look something like this:

  1. Type in basic information about a product/topic
  2. GPT-3 generates copies
  3. Generate again or pick out the copy you liked most
  4. Let GPT-3 take the position of a potential customer that asks (critical) questions
  5. In case GPT-3 touches on some important topics that you can make use of for a better copy: Improve copy
  6. Let GPT-3 ask again and improve until no relevant pain points etc. are left unaddressed

Here's a 2 min demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-T3sdsuBHs

Copywriting is a very popular use case for GPT-3-Apps and it seems like two companies (copy.ai and copysmith.ai) are getting ever-more dominant in this niche. However, I hope that the feedback-loop-feature is somewhat gamifying the experience and making it more fun to use than the competition's "generate-only" implementations. Comparing the idea & demo with copy.ai and copysmith.ai, do you think my app stands a chance? And if not, where do I have to improve most?

on May 7, 2021
Trending on Indie Hackers
Three Days Before Launch, I Let My Own Tool Tear Me Apart User Avatar 37 comments Priorities for launching a SaaS solo, with no budget User Avatar 35 comments I thought I was building a news visualization tool. Users thought it was a catch-up tool. User Avatar 34 comments I Rejected a $15K Acquisition Offer for My Multi-Agent IDE — Here's the Full Breakdown User Avatar 28 comments 5 Books, Make Smarter User Avatar 7 comments I realized AI agents don’t fail because they can’t think. They fail because their tools are chaos. User Avatar 5 comments