4
26 Comments

Looking for founders who need a long-term technical team

Hey Indie Hackers,
We're a software development team that specializes in being the technical backbone for founders who have a product idea or early MVP but need engineering help to scale it properly.
What we do:

Build and architect scalable platforms (we've built live marketplaces, e-commerce platforms, complex backend systems)
Handle ongoing maintenance, feature development, and scaling as your product grows
Work on monthly retainer basis so you have a reliable technical team you can count on

What we're looking for:
Founders with a live product or validated idea who need a dedicated technical partner to handle the engineering side while they focus on growth, customers, and business.
We've worked on acquisition-stage products and marketplace platforms. Happy to share case studies if you're a fit.
How we work:
Monthly retainer, no equity required. You own the product, we own the technical execution.
If this sounds like what you need, reply here or DM me.

posted to Icon for group Looking to Partner Up
Looking to Partner Up
on July 10, 2026
  1. 1

    Hi! How does your operation go? And if it sits well, I would like to see some real demos/case studies you've worked on recently.

    Cheers!

    1. 1

      Hey, thanks for asking! Operation's going well, we've been heads-down building for a few SaaS founders lately. You can check out two recent case studies here: forgex.systems/#work (cut a founder's weekly outreach from 40 hours to 5, and reduced tax filing time from 10 hours to 30 min for another).

      Happy to walk you through more specifics or talk about what you're building , feel free to grab a time here: forgex.systems/book, or just reply/email me at [email protected].

    1. 1

      Thanks, appreciate that! 🙌 Are you working on something at the moment, or just browsing IH?

    1. 1

      Thanks! Let me know if you're ever looking for technical help down the line.

  2. 1

    I’d love to learn more about your team, previous projects, and how you work with clients

    1. 1

      Hey Michealjack, appreciate you reaching out!

      Looking at your background in games, mobile apps and business development it sounds like you work closely with founders and builders too so there might be some good overlap here.

      I would love to have a quick chat, walk you through how we work, the kind of projects we have handled and see if there is any way we can collaborate or if any founders in your network could benefit from what we do.

      If that sounds good just shoot me an email at [email protected] and we can find a time that works for both of us.

  3. 1

    The monthly-retainer model makes sense for products that need continuous development, but the initial commitment can still feel significant for an early-stage founder. A short paid discovery sprint with an architecture review, a prioritized roadmap, and clear ownership of repositories and infrastructure would make the working relationship easier to evaluate. Do you offer this kind of trial phase before moving to a long-term retainer?

    1. 1

      Starting with a paid discovery sprint is a great way to build trust and test the workflow before locking into a long-term retainer.

    2. 1

      Thanks for asking, honestly not many founders think to ask this and it's a smart question to have upfront. You're right that jumping straight into a long term retainer without validating fit first isn't ideal for either side.
      So yes, we do offer a trial phase before moving into a full retainer. Usually it looks like a 1 to 2 month discovery period where we map out a complete roadmap of the implementation along with clear deliverables, so you can see exactly how we work, how we communicate, and the quality of what we deliver before committing long term.

  4. 1

    im definitely looking for a technical cofounder/CTO i can offer 15-20 percent pure quity with 4 year vesting cliff . I have done almost all the work in terms of creating a clear business idea , product deisngn, as well as built mock proototypes for the screens . im not so technical so their is a limit i could use ai to do . i need a techncial team as the techncial difficulty isnt much

    1. 1

      Hey Ayodej, sounds like you've put in solid groundwork already, having clear mockups and a defined idea puts you ahead of most early-stage founders. Rather than going back and forth here, it'd be more useful to hop on a quick discovery call so we can go through the designs and talk through what a good fit would look like. Feel free to email me at [email protected] and we'll get something scheduled. Looking forward to hearing from you!

  5. 1

    Monthly-retainer technical teams work best when the handoff details are nailed down before month one; at 6senseHQ we've seen engagements stall not from code quality but from unclear ownership of infra decisions once the retainer starts. Following this thread with interest that the "you own the product, we own execution" framing is the right one, but I'd push on one thing: what happens to institutional knowledge if a founder needs to bring engineering in-house later? That handoff-back problem is the one dedicated-team models don't always plan for upfront.

    1. 2

      Good question, and honestly a fair one. Our approach is that founders stay involved in every major technical decision, not just the roadmap level stuff. Part of the reason for that is exactly what you're pointing at. If a founder can defend their own architecture in a room, they're never dependent on us to understand their own product, even if we're the ones building it.
      On documentation and handoff specifically, everything gets documented as we go, and full ownership transfer is always something we can do if a founder wants to bring the team in-house. In practice it's rare since most of our engagements turn into long term contracts rather than clean exits, but when it does happen it's a structured transition, usually a few weeks of joint working sessions with the incoming team depending on how complex the product is.

  6. 1

    I’m building a real‑time social platform. Curious whether your team has experience with real‑time systems or trust/safety features. Happy to chat if it sounds like a fit.

    1. 1

      Hey Jennifer,
      I saw your comment on Hamza's post about building a real-time social platform and needing help with real-time systems and trust/safety features. I wanted to reach out directly because I think I can help.
      Real-time is not a buzzword for me. I built a dating app called Belle with real-time push notifications (FCM and APNs), a daily discovery feed that refreshes in real-time, and real-time photo swap features. 13 independent microservices on AWS EC2 handling the backend. The tricky part wasn't making the real-time stuff work in a demo. It was making it work when 500 people are swiping at the same time and the push notification has to arrive before the user closes the app.
      On the trust/safety side, I get why that matters for a social platform. One bad actor can poison the whole community. I've built user management systems with role-based access, content permission layers, and reporting flows. For a social platform, you need abuse detection that catches the bad stuff without flagging innocent users, and a moderation system that doesn't require a human to review every single report at 3am.

      I'd love to hear more about what you're building. What stage are you at? Do you have a prototype or are you still in the idea phase? What's the hardest technical problem you're facing right now?
      No pitch. Just genuinely curious and I think I can help.
      Hammas

      1. 1

        Handling scale and high concurrency under simultaneous push notifications is definitely the hardest part of building real-time systems.

    2. 1

      Hey Jennifer, thanks for asking!
      Yes, we've built real-time messaging/chat before for an early-stage prototype we used Supabase for real-time chat, and for a scaled app with around 10k users we moved that to dedicated microservices to handle the load. On the safety side, we've also built abuse prevention for public comments using a fine-tuned ML model, and a reporting system for one-to-one chat where an LLM reviews reports and takes action like a warning or ban.
      Happy to share more details or a case study want to continue in DMs, or is email easier? I'm at [email protected] if so.

      1. 1

        Hi Hamza,

        Thanks for the detailed reply. The real‑time messaging work and the safety tooling you described are definitely relevant to what I’m building. I’d be interested in seeing a case study. We can continue here . I’ll also reach out to you via email on your side.

        1. 1

          Sounds good, Jennifer! I can put together a detailed case study for you covering the architecture, the real-time messaging setup, and the moderation/reporting tooling
          in pdf document. Feel free to email me, and I'll send it right over.

          1. 1

            Thanks Hamza,

            I’ve just sent you an email. Looking forward to the case study.

    3. 1

      Hi Jennifer, I noticed your comment about building a real-time social platform Real-time systems and trust/safety are definitely areas where architecture matters early. I help founders build and scale products long-term. I'd love to hear what you're building and see if we can help.

      1. 1

        Hi,
        Thanks for the message , building a social platform with real time system, pls feel free to share more about your experience with real‑time or safety‑focused systems.

        1. 1

          Jennifer! Real-time social platforms bring some specific architecture challenges early on - connection scaling (websockets/pub-sub), message delivery guarantees, and building moderation in from day one rather than bolting it on later.
          A bit about our experience:

          Real-time infra: We've built and scaled real-time messaging systems, including moving from simpler managed solutions to dedicated microservices once user load picked up (handling concurrent connections, presence, delivery guarantees).
          Trust & safety: We've implemented abuse detection using fine-tuned ML models for public content, plus automated report review/action systems for private messaging.
          Scaling: We've worked on marketplace and social products through their growth stages, so we're used to the kind of re-architecture that comes with user growth.

          Would love to learn more about what stage you're at and what's on your roadmap. Feel free to DM me here.

          1. 1

            Thanks ,
            CHAToora is already built, and we’re currently in the founding‑member stage. I’m specifically looking for people with hands‑on experience in real‑time messaging, moderation tooling, and scaling social platforms. If that aligns with your background, feel free to share more.

Trending on Indie Hackers
How to rank #1 on ChatGPT? User Avatar 112 comments I built a startup-idea scanner. It just told me none of my 3,400 ideas are easy wins. User Avatar 66 comments “I’ll just post on Upwork” is not a client strategy. Here’s what I built instead. User Avatar 51 comments Building a Shopify bundles app for stores with real fulfillment: here's the wedge User Avatar 42 comments I recorded myself using 200+ indie SaaS products cold. Here are the 7 conversion killers that keep showing up. User Avatar 32 comments How to automate refund reviews without giving AI the final say User Avatar 29 comments