3
7 Comments

Looking for a founding engineer (equity) – building Management IQ

I’m building Management IQ, a product that helps industry-specific business owners make better operational decisions without needing to be experts in everything.
It’s not another dashboard or reporting tool. The idea is simple: you ask a real operational question and get a clear, practical answer you can actually act on.
I have a mid-tier consulting company and understand the operations / commercial side, having spent years running and fixing real businesses. I know the problems the businesses are facing. I’m now looking for a founding engineer to help turn this into a real product.
I already have a clear view on funding and distribution; the main risk to solve is building a product that can genuinely scale.
Who this is for
You’re probably someone who:
• Likes building from zero
• Cares more about shipping than perfect architecture
• Wants ownership, not just tasks
• Is curious about how businesses actually work
• Is comfortable saying “that’s a bad idea” and explaining why
2–6 years’ experience is fine if you can build.
Tech-wise
You’ll likely be comfortable with:
• React / Next.js
• Node or Python
• APIs and backend logic
• Interested in working with LLMs (or already have)
Stack isn’t fixed, speed and clarity matter more.
Structure
This is equity-first (roughly 15–20% depending on commitment).
I’d prefer to start with a small 30-day build on one focused feature to make sure we work well together before locking anything in.
Why this might be worth your time
• Real ownership from day one
• A product solving real-world problems
• Direct access to decisions
• Clear path to CTO if it scales
If this sounds interesting, send me a short note and links to anything you’ve built (GitHub, demos, live products).

posted to Icon for group Looking to Partner Up
Looking to Partner Up
on January 19, 2026
  1. 1

    That 30-day build test is a smart move to avoid big upfront risks

    I spent 8 months building a SaaS with zero paying customers, so tbh testing fit early as you plan sounds way better

    -Keep validating demand while building the first feature, so you don't waste time
    -Make sure the founding engineer is comfortable calling out bad ideas, which can save a lot of headaches
    -Focus on speed and clarity over perfect tech decisions early on

    How are you planning to validate demand alongside that initial 30-day build?

  2. 1

    Hi Rawco! Love how clearly you’ve thought about risk here, especially starting with a 30-day build to test both product and collaboration.

    We're a studio with over 10 years of experience collaborating with founders to accelerate product development

    We spend a lot of time helping founders scope and ship exactly that kind of focused first version while validating demand in parallel. If it’s ever useful to compare notes or sanity-check the first cut, feel free to reach out.

  3. 1

    Hey Rawco! If you are still looking for someone let me know! Technical cofounder with many years of experience. Hit me up!
    @Rawco

  4. 1

    This is exactly the kind of situation I keep running into.

    When someone says “I’ll get back to you in a few days”,
    the hardest part isn’t waiting — it’s not knowing what they actually mean.

    Do you usually follow up, or do you treat that as a soft no?

  5. 1

    Hi Rawco,
    I am interested but would like to know more about business idea.

    I already have experience in operations (4 years) and into tech from last three years.
    let's discuss.

  6. 1

    This caught my eye. I've already built and deployed a live product that focuses on structuring vague intent into constrained, decision oriented outputs for LLMs. While my current implementation is more general-purpose, the underlying engine is explicitly designed around trade-offs, constraints, and structured reasoning which feels very aligned with what you're describing for operational decisions.

    I'd be interested in a short conversation to sanity-check overlap and see whether a scoped 30-day build would make sense for both sides. If useful, I'm happy to share a live demo or walk through the architecture, to see if this might be something of interest in relation to developing your product. Feel free to reply here or provide a contact link for further discussion.

  7. 1

    Hey Rawco,
    Quick question are you currently looking to get help with Management IQ this week or next, or is hiring lower priority right now?

  8. 1

    This comment was deleted 15 days ago.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I'm a lawyer who launched an AI contract tool on Product Hunt today — here's what building it as a non-technical founder actually felt like User Avatar 142 comments “This contract looked normal - but could cost millions” User Avatar 54 comments A simple way to keep AI automations from making bad decisions User Avatar 47 comments 👉 The most expensive contract mistakes don’t feel risky User Avatar 41 comments The indie maker's dilemma: 2 months in, 700 downloads, and I'm stuck User Avatar 40 comments Never hire an SEO Agency for your Saas Startup User Avatar 37 comments