3
4 Comments

I made an AI-powered chat moderation bot for your Telegram community

Hey IH makers!

👋 I'm Ben and I recently built https://watchdog.chat, an AI-powered chat moderation bot for your Telegram group. Product Hunt link: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/watchdog-4

🍿 Demo video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDQd9DFbTz4

🤖 Fully automate chat moderation for your Telegram community with AI and never worry about rulebreakers, trolls, or spambots again!

👮‍♂️ Define rules in plain English. You can even customize the rules and associated punishments per community or per channel

💰 Pricing starting at just $9/mo, with an additional 2 months free if you pay annually. Free trial available with all plans.

🤮 Allergic to subscriptions? Don't worry, there's also a one-time (credit-based) pricing if your community is just getting started, and the credits never expire 🙌

🙏 Check it out and let me know what you think! Thanks so much.

posted to Icon for group Building in Public
Building in Public
on May 4, 2024
  1. 3

    I'm one of the early beta testers for Watchdog. It's awesome to witness the potential for AI in moderating trolls and undesirable messages in my communities and chat groups. Since adding Watchdog to my local chat group, I no longer worry about not catching spam messages in the chat while I'm asleep.

    1. 1

      Thanks Jason! Has been great working with you.

  2. 1

    So it's kind of a "Dyno" but for telegram?

    1. 1

      It's similar, but better. Dyno isn't able to intelligently monitor messages, it just looks for banned words which leads to too many false positives in my experience.

      If your banned word is "fuck" for example, you wouldn't want to ban someone that says "hey, that's really fucking cool!" or "fuck, I'm sorry to hear that man" but you probably would if they tell another member to "go fuck themselves."

      That's where Watchdog shines. You can define rules in plain English like "no insulting language towards other members" instead of simple banned words/string filters and the number of false positives is significantly reduced that way.

      I'll add some "compared to" pages on the landing page to make the differences between existing solutions and Watchdog much more clear.

      Thanks for the comment!

Trending on Indie Hackers
From Ideas to a Content Factory: The Rise of SuperMaker AI User Avatar 27 comments Why Early-Stage Founders Should Consider Skipping Prior Art Searches for Their Patent Applications User Avatar 21 comments Codenhack Beta — Full Access + Referral User Avatar 19 comments I built eSIMKitStore — helping travelers stay online with instant QR-based eSIMs 🌍 User Avatar 17 comments Building something...? User Avatar 12 comments Day 6 - Slow days as a solo founder User Avatar 11 comments