Following indie hackers, I changed my landing page. Any feedback?
I posted this (https://www.indiehackers.com/post/my-product-is-in-a-miserable-position-any-advice-935c6ae7f1), and many indie hackers gave advice. So I changed the landing page based on the advice.
In my opinion this is now more concise and easier to understand than before. But I'm curious about the opinions of others. Any feedback...?
- My landing page is: https://learnobit.com
Trending on Indie Hackers
After 19,314 lines of code, i'm shutting down my project
Need feedback for my product.
We are live on Product Hunt
Don't be a Jerk. Use this Tip Calculator.
I am agree with another comments, it looks cool the website, but I don't understand the idea yet. I get bored after scroll. Do all the exercises of this website , it helps me a lot.
https://www.julian.com/guide/growth/landing-pages
Doesn't the page explicitly state what the product is like? What parts do you not understand??
Your syntax is off, especially with that headline. But I won't go into too much detail, because I think you're making the #1 mistake Indie Hackers make with their landing pages.
Go back to the research you did before putting in any dev work. Start with the problem your target audience is looking to solve and present your product as the solution.
Do you think nobody wants this product after all? Why?????
I don't know whether or not people want the product. I haven't done any research into what the problem is you're trying to solve, for whom, how frustrating the problem is for them, or what they are currently doing to deal with it.
But if it is a problem people are willing to pay to have solved, that's what they're interested in. A solution. They care about what's in it for them. That's what you need to be selling.
Doesn't the page explicitly say why this is better than the existing product?
Not really. There is a bit about why it's better than traditional spaced repetition tools but I'm not even sure what that means. Maybe this is jargon your target audience uses? And the copy under that heading isn't all that convincing. It lacks details and or proof.
But even if it did, is the pain point that people are frustrated with those spaced repetition tools? Or is it that they find learning new things challenging and time consuming? If it's the latter, I'd focus on the results your product can deliver. Make it about the user, not the product.
I see. Thank you. I tweaked it based on your advice.
It was little unclear I had to scroll. The animation is cool but doesn't add any value.
Your a developer and you write copy like a developer (I do the same thing haha). I asked myself this question: But how does it help me? Why do I need this? What problem does it solve? What is it?
Thank you for the comment. And thanks for pointing out that whether scrolling was needed or not is unclear. I didn't notice.